Turn security signals
into informed response.
Connect alerts, system context, investigation evidence, and response decisions. Help analysts understand the issue and coordinate the next approved step.
A proposal is not permission.
Show the evidence, review the recommendation, and make the decision explicit.
A finding needs context. A response needs authority.
Security teams need to move between the signal, the affected system, the evidence, and the response process. Connect that work so the next decision is informed by the investigation—not separated from it.
Connect security context
Bring configured security feeds and system information into the investigation.
Develop the evidence
Support alert correlation, incident investigation, and analyst-led threat hunting.
Coordinate response
Use playbooks and review checkpoints to structure the proposed next step.
Preserve the decision
Keep investigation context and response disposition available for review.
Investigate a security alert
An analyst receives a contextualized finding, reviews the evidence, and decides whether a proposed response should proceed.
Receive
Bring an alert from a configured security source into the workflow.
Enrich
Assemble relevant system information and related evidence.
Investigate
Prepare an evidence-led summary and a proposed next step.
Review
Have an authorized analyst approve or decline the proposed response.
Respond
Use a configured response integration and record the outcome.
Example solution pattern—not a claim that this exact workflow is deployed in your environment. Data, integrations, checks, and reviewer authority are configured and validated for the implementation.
Apply it to the work
your team already does.
Alert investigation
Coordinate triage, supporting evidence, and analyst review.
Response playbooks
Connect the investigation to permitted response actions and approvals.
Insider-risk case review
Scope evidence-led reviews using authorized records, privacy rules, and human judgment.
Configuration & integration
Feed access, telemetry sources, playbooks, response tools, and approval policies are scoped for each environment. Insider-risk use cases require an explicit legal, privacy, and access framework.
Where the authority stays
An investigation workflow is not a claim of native endpoint monitoring, universal threat detection, or an independently validated insider-risk scoring product. Coverage depends on the actual data and integrations.
Keep the workflow connected.
See this workflow.
In your context.
Talk through your sources, review process, and operating environment.